Since no one from Creative Frontiers School will offer up this information, I suppose you will get to hear it here instead. Zsolt Benedek, as Creative Frontiers LLC, applied for a business license, remember way back, when they said the school was going to reopen on September 6th? Well, the City of Citrus Heights has denied that application. Why? Is it yet another conspiracy? No dear readers, it is because, as they were told multiple times, you can't have it both ways.
Creative Frontiers School, Inc, has a business license that is in revocation hearings currently. The owner of Creative Frontiers School, Inc, is Robert Adams. Robert Adams still owns the property at 6446 Sylvan Road, Citrus Heights, California, 95610. To apply for a new license, for the same type of business, with the same owner of property, with nearly the same name, with the only change being from Robert Adams to his future son-in-law? It doesn't take a rocket scientist to understand the game that was being played here.
Sorry Zsolt, guess you will have to move Creative Frontiers, LLC to a new town like you threatened to in your last letter.
City of Citrus Heights Business file on Creative Frontiers
City of Citrus Heights Business file on Creative Frontiers, updated
Letter to Zsolt Benedek Denying the Business License Application
Interesting that they have maintained their silence on the CFS Facebook page on the denial. Where is the outrage??? The wild accusations and crazy conspiracy theories??? Hmmm??
ReplyDeleteMaybe they are just too busy with their own "investigation?"
BG-"Good work Dan, and whomever else is helping with investigating this woman. Although it won't stop her from making up new screen names every 5 minutes to post on the Sac Bee blogs, perhaps this will give others the heads' up that we're serious about getting down to the truth all the way around. It's so easy to point fingers and get people all riled up and hysterical with accusations, but with so many of us determined to clear away the smoke screens, people might want to back off now before they too are exposed."
Oh my!! I'm certainly shaking in my boots at the thought of the "smoke screen" clearing and being "exposed." Goodness, that thinly-veiled threat certainly scared me straight, I sure better get myself together and, "back off." LOL!!
The bloggers aren't on trial here, dear lady, we can voice our opinions without fear of being "exposed." You're chasing shadows if you think that going after Mrs. X and internet bloggers is going to change anything having to do with CFS.
Signed,
DoubtingSupporterSanity
I still fail to see why several supporters seem so insistent on believing that we are all one person, and that person is "Mrs. X". I know for a fact *I* am not her. I know for a fact *you* are not her. I also know for a fact she has never even posted on the Sacramento Bee comments section. I'm not sure how or why her "Victim's Perspective" post she wrote here somehow makes her one of Mr. Adams "most vocal accusers" in their eyes either. She told her story. That is all.
ReplyDeleteI'm prepared for their next "educated" guess at my identity. What are they going to "expose"? That I write for a blog? That I am waiting for more evidence in the case before I form an opinion? That I am smart enough to know that "well-respected" does not mean "not capable of committing terrible crimes"?
I suppose though that it is easier to dismiss us if they think we are all one person. Looks like you are going down with me DoubtingSupporterSanity, since you are merely a figment of my imagination.
How does the writer's identity reflect in any way on the reality of this case? Did you (the writer/s) have anything to do with the denial of the license application? I doubt it, yet you are being faulted for once again bringing the truth to the forefront. How funny it would be to reveal all these desperate, sad, little people's identities. I know you are above this sort of behavior, but it seems as though they have underhandedly attempted to expose, belittle, malign and target you and anyone who disagrees with their cult-like devotion to the accused.
ReplyDeleteThank you for continuing to seek and reveal the truth.
I am now waiting for CP's expose on the two Vacaville preschools that were closed by DSS this week and how that somehow relates to this case and all the others.
ReplyDeleteCP might go down that road, I think he thinks he found his cash cow here, though. It's actually disgusting, the way those few supporters are actually working with that vermin. That "man" tries to help convicted pedophiles, he has pictures of your children on his website, which those pedophiles peruse.
ReplyDeleteThink about it!! He is the LAST person you want around your children. He advocates and protects pedophiles. And supporters, you are doing the same thing by associating with him. This has nothing to do with Mr. Bob, we don't now if he is guilty or not, but we do know that CP's website is full of "wrongfully convicted" pedophiles.
Don't let yourselves be drawn to him because you think he can help Mr. Bob if he is found guilty. He seeks donations FOR HIS OWN USE. Look at the pedophiles on his sites, would you leave your children with them just because CP says they are innocent, despite a jury finding them guilty, appeal after appeal denied?
Thank goodness most of the supporters have jumped ship, if for no other reason than their children won't be able to be abused and exploited by CP and his insanity. Too bad those pictures of the kids are still out there for him to use.
Oh, and for the record, I have no intent on identifying myself--but I will say this. I do have direct knowledge of CFS. I am not Mrs. X, I have never met her or had any contact with her. I have personally emailed the blog owners of this site and they know by my IP address and my email I am not Mrs. X. So you can put the theory that we're all the Mrs. X to bed. I have posted on the SacBee website, and I have only one moniker that I use there. So there's one less here and one less there you all can scratch off the list of Mrs. X and her supposed "multiple monikers."
Signed,
DoubtingSupporterSanity
Good point again DoubtingSupporterSanity. I wonder how many who are listening to and believing the drivel CP is pushing about "Mrs. X" would leave their children with Ryan Smith to babysit? Maybe Jeremy Barney perhaps?
ReplyDeleteAnd thank you Judi. I assure you, and anyone else reading, I had nothing to do with the business license denial, the lack of degrees, or the lack of repairs at the school.
ReplyDeleteAs I said before, they can keep guessing, because they haven't come close yet. Even if they knew my name, the documents are what they are. All I have done is post them. My identity wouldn't make what is written on them any less, or any more, true.